.
Feedback

State: East Haven Among 'Lowest-Performing' School Districts

The state designation gives East Haven, as well as the 29 other members of the newly created Alliance Districts, the opportunity to apply for an increase in conditional state grants to fund school reforms focused on raising student achievement.

The school year may be just about over for students, but it appears that East Haven school administrators will have plenty of homework to do over the summer.

The Connecticut Department of Education recently released its new academic achievement rankings for the state's 166 public school districts.

And not only finds itself listed among the 30 most struggling school systems — but in the bottom half of the rankings for the weakest academic performers.

A conditional increase in state education grants for the new school year, however, will be made available to East Haven — as well as the other 29 school systems targeted as most in need of improvement — for the implementation of a district-wide reform plan focused on raising student achievement levels.

And it is a tight schedule for the process: preliminary applications for the additional funding are due later next month, with the state hoping to have all final reform plan approvals out by the end of August.

Superintendent of Schools Anthony Serio did not immediately return a Tuesday morning call from East Haven Patch requesting comment for this article.

Alliance District

East Haven is part of the ," which is made up of the state's 30 lowest-performing public school systems.

The special group was established with the passage of the earlier this spring.

The Alliance designations will continue for a five-year period.

Alliance District membership is determined by the state education department's newly created "District Performance Index."

The school systems with the lowest DPI scores statewide are placed in the group.

______________________________________________________________________________________

Interested in East Haven's news, events, community bulletins, blogs and businesses? Sign up for the East Haven Patch daily newsletter, "like" us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
________________________________________________________________________________________

District Performance Index

District Performance Index, or DPI, scores are calculated and based upon Connecticut Mastery Test data. The index is scored from 0 to 100, with 100 being the highest score.

East Haven received a DPI of 54.8, the 13th lowest in the state.

The top score among the 30 Alliance Districts is Bristol at 62.5, and the lowest is New Britain at 35.8.

East Haven Schools achieved an higher DPI than New Haven, Waterbury and New London. But lower than neighboring West Haven, Hamden and Naugatuck.

A chart with the individual DPI scores for each of the Alliance Districts is posted in the gallery that accompanies this article.

Conditional Funding Increase

As part of the education reform act, a total of $39.5 million in additional Education Cost Sharing grant money for the 2012-13 school year has been set to help fund education reforms in the 30 struggling school systems.

East Haven Schools could receive some from the state for fiscal 2012-13.

To receive their share of the funding increase, however, each Alliance District — including East Haven — must successfully develop a proposed reform plan to improve and enhance student performance.

That proposed plan, which is for a five-year period, must then be reviewed and approved by the state Department of Education.

If given the green light, the Alliance-related funding — unlike the rest of the ECS grant — will be distributed directly to school districts and not through municipalities, according to a May 25 memo from state Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor.

The memo, which provides a preliminary overview of the Alliance program, is posted in the gallery.

Summer Deadlines

And Alliance District school officials met with Pryor in Hartford on Monday to discuss the details of conditional funding program, according to the Hartford Courant.

Along with a Boston-based non-profit organization, the meeting discussed ways the superintendents could utilize the funds, including extending school hours and enhancing literary programs.

The districts have until July 13 to submit preliminary applications and Aug. 15 for final applications. According to Pryor, the state is looking to have applications approved by Aug. 31.

The National Center on Time & Learning will also assist five qualifying districts in creating a plan to extend school hours. The organization will choose those districts by July 29.

East Haven Board of Education Chairman Thomas Hennessey did not immediately return a Tuesday morning call to his home from East Haven Patch requesting comment for this article.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from East Haven Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Stephen Austin May 20, 2013 at 11:14 am
I'm sorry I don't have any equipment.
Lori Marcucci May 20, 2013 at 09:29 am
I have a 16 year old son that might be able to help. He needs to earn some money. Do you have theRead More equipment? You can contact me with the info Thank you
Not Guido May 19, 2013 at 10:11 am
I agree Jack is a good man. He however needs to better explain his financial problems. ForeclosureRead More doesn't go forward due to a mistake. Stand up and tell the truth. If you fell behind and got back on track tell us.
Sam Giglio May 18, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Jack is a good and decent man, He would be an asset to this Town if Elected to serve as our Mayor.Read More With that said we look forward to a new beginning in East Haven, One that can set the path to a new vision for the Residents who live here now and the ones yet to come. Yes its easy to say I like Jack
Richard Poulton May 18, 2013 at 03:53 pm
Gene, Jack is your party's pick, so what else are you to say. As to Jack, if he is anything likeRead More his father he IS a good man. But being just a good man doesn't cut it in todays small world politics. Jack has issues he needs to explain and I am sure when he time comes he will. But as to this article, I wouldn't expect anything else from the SHADOW. Wouldn't want him backing me for anything.
Richard Poulton May 19, 2013 at 08:24 am
I asked the question and you gave me the answer I was looking for, and I thank you for that. As toRead More the rest of your dribble, doesn't deserve a response for EVERYONR knows all about the true Gene aka ******** Ruocco.
Gene Ruocco May 18, 2013 at 04:24 pm
Richard, the Mayor kicked the CEO of the company that had the contract out of his office less than aRead More month after he won the election. The contract was with the town not the BOE. And if you think the only thing to check is if the panels are dirty, then it isn't worth answering you. A large investment of tax dollars was made and it is paying off with lower electric bills. The systems delivering these savings need to be checked, that is why people who were smart enough to sign a maintenance agreement did just that. Ask the BOE how the chiller replacement is going at the High School; due to lack of maintenance they lost two chillers that should have lasted at least 10 to 15 more years. Penny wise and dollar foolish is what this is all about, not the election year, but what else could we expect from you Richard. You have become the cheer leader of the administration.
Richard Poulton May 18, 2013 at 03:58 pm
Boy, you just know it's an election year. Gene, one question, when was this contract stopped?Read More Just now or some time ago, but seeing its getting "close' to November you just thought you would bring this up. Besides, shouldn't your question be aimed at the B of E, not the Mayor. And what is to be maintained anyway beside washing the panals now and then? You just keep us all informed now Gene.