.
Feedback

Federal Court Rules East Haven Not Liable in Malik Jones Death (DOCUMENT)

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York has found the town is not liable in the 1997 fatal shooting of Malik Jones by an East Haven Police officer, according to an Associated Press report.

Update at 10 a.m. on Thursday

Video of reaction to the federal appeals court ruling from East Haven Mayor Joseph Maturo Jr and town attorneys — as well as David Rosen, the attorney for Malik Jones' mother Emma Jones — has .

Update at 12:30 p.m.

In today's ruling finding the town not liable for Malik Jones' death, the federal appeals court did make note it was well aware of the into the East Haven Police Department for , as well as the by a federal grand jury for alleged civil rights abuses.

In their decision the justices wrote:

"Our ruling on this appeal should not be taken as expressing any view of this court on the question whether the Town of East Haven or its police department discriminated in any way against minorities. A federal appellate court makes no assessment of the true facts. Our court has no investigative authority and does not find facts. It reviews only the record created by the parties in the course of trial. We conclude, for reasons expressed below, that the Plaintiff’s evidence presented at trial was insufficient as a matter of law to establish liability of the Town by reason of a custom, policy, or usage of discrimination or of indifference to discrimination. Whether that is because there is no real discrimination or indifference, or because Plaintiff has simply failed to discover and present evidence of it, is beyond the competence of this court. Our ruling assesses only the sufficiency of the evidence presented at the trial – not the true facts."

Update at 12:15 p.m

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling has been attached to this article.

Update at 11:45 a.m.

East Haven has just released a press release stating the mayor — along with Town Attorney Joseph Zullo and Assistant Town Attorney Hugh Keefe — will hold a press conference at later this afternoon to discuss the findings of the federal appeals court regarding the .

The talk with the media will begin at 3:30 p.m.

East Haven Patch will be posting updates from this afternoon's press conference via Facebook and Twitter.

Original Story

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York has ruled the Town of East Haven is not liable in the 1997 fatal shooting of by an East Haven Police officer, according to an Associated Press report.

The decision, which overturns a lower court's ruling on October 2010 that , was released Wednesday by the federal appeals court.

The AP reported that the 2nd Circuit "found the evidence was insufficient to hold the town liable."

A federal jury awarded $900,000 to the estate of Malik Jones in October 2010, 13 years after a former officer, Robert Flodquist, chased him into New Haven and then shot the 21-year-old dead at close range. Jones was unarmed at the time.

Flodquist later said Jones gave him a "go to Hell" look, and the car may have been slowly rolling backwards, so he thought his life was at risk.

After both the the state's attorney and the the U.S. Department of Justice chose not to pursue criminal charges against the East Haven Police regarding the incident, Malik Jones' mother, , filed a federal lawsuit against the town claiming the police had violated her son's civil rights. In her suit, she argued that the incident was part of a pattern of discriminatory practices by the East Haven Police Department.

Although the initial court decision on the case ruled against the town in Jones' favor — awarding the family $2.5 million in damages — the jury made a technical error. It awarded punitive damages instead of compensatory damages.

Under federal law, a municipality can only be held liable for compensatory damages. So the judge, Alvin W. Thompson, ordered a new trial — not on the guilty verdict — but on whether to award compensatory damages. That second jury found in Jones' favor, awarding the $900,000 in damages.

The Town of East Haven then of that decision, which is what the federal court decided upon in today's ruling.

East Haven Patch will have additional updates as this story continues to develop.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Receive updates to this story and other East Haven breaking news: Sign up for the daily newsletter, "like" us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
________________________________________________________________________________________

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from East Haven Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Stephen Austin May 20, 2013 at 11:14 am
I'm sorry I don't have any equipment.
Lori Marcucci May 20, 2013 at 09:29 am
I have a 16 year old son that might be able to help. He needs to earn some money. Do you have theRead More equipment? You can contact me with the info Thank you
Not Guido May 19, 2013 at 10:11 am
I agree Jack is a good man. He however needs to better explain his financial problems. ForeclosureRead More doesn't go forward due to a mistake. Stand up and tell the truth. If you fell behind and got back on track tell us.
Sam Giglio May 18, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Jack is a good and decent man, He would be an asset to this Town if Elected to serve as our Mayor.Read More With that said we look forward to a new beginning in East Haven, One that can set the path to a new vision for the Residents who live here now and the ones yet to come. Yes its easy to say I like Jack
Richard Poulton May 18, 2013 at 03:53 pm
Gene, Jack is your party's pick, so what else are you to say. As to Jack, if he is anything likeRead More his father he IS a good man. But being just a good man doesn't cut it in todays small world politics. Jack has issues he needs to explain and I am sure when he time comes he will. But as to this article, I wouldn't expect anything else from the SHADOW. Wouldn't want him backing me for anything.
Richard Poulton May 19, 2013 at 08:24 am
I asked the question and you gave me the answer I was looking for, and I thank you for that. As toRead More the rest of your dribble, doesn't deserve a response for EVERYONR knows all about the true Gene aka ******** Ruocco.
Gene Ruocco May 18, 2013 at 04:24 pm
Richard, the Mayor kicked the CEO of the company that had the contract out of his office less than aRead More month after he won the election. The contract was with the town not the BOE. And if you think the only thing to check is if the panels are dirty, then it isn't worth answering you. A large investment of tax dollars was made and it is paying off with lower electric bills. The systems delivering these savings need to be checked, that is why people who were smart enough to sign a maintenance agreement did just that. Ask the BOE how the chiller replacement is going at the High School; due to lack of maintenance they lost two chillers that should have lasted at least 10 to 15 more years. Penny wise and dollar foolish is what this is all about, not the election year, but what else could we expect from you Richard. You have become the cheer leader of the administration.
Richard Poulton May 18, 2013 at 03:58 pm
Boy, you just know it's an election year. Gene, one question, when was this contract stopped?Read More Just now or some time ago, but seeing its getting "close' to November you just thought you would bring this up. Besides, shouldn't your question be aimed at the B of E, not the Mayor. And what is to be maintained anyway beside washing the panals now and then? You just keep us all informed now Gene.