.
Feedback

The Trickle-down Effect of Parental Alienation - A Journal

Parental Alienation not only affects the alienated parent and extended family but it also has a detrimental and debilitating effect on the lives of the children involved...

Last week I learned the true meaning of Parental Alienation and its' "trickle-down" effects. I attended a wake last Friday for Nick Mastrangelo, Sr. He was a wonderful father to his four children, devoted husband to his wife of 61 years and grandfather to seven. As expected, most all of his family was there to lend each other support during this very difficult time. Unfortunately, for Jerry, Nick's eldest son, his triplet children were not there sitting next to him. Jerry, a man who has been a caring, loving and wonderful father could not benefit from one of those rare times when nothing comforts like a child's own love and caring. After all, this is what Jerry and his father before him strived to reinforce in the minds of all the Mastrangelos...there is nothing like family. Luckily, Jerry had his ever devoted girlfriend Jennifer to lean on. Jerry had asked his ex-wife Trudianne Formica, out of respect to his mother and siblings, not to attend the wake with the triplets. It was a night to mourn his father and being that they have only seen their grandparents once in the past two years and never visited their grandfather while sick, either in the hospital or at home as he was dying, their presence would be upsetting to his mother, sisters and brother in their fragile state. In a phone conversation, Jerry asked Trudianne to abide by their wishes. She threatened that if he did not put it in writing, she would show up. When Jerry persisted, she promptly hung up on him. This certainly wasn't a time for legal maneuvers. thankfully, she had the sense to keep them away from the wake. It's important to note that up until the divorce and for some time after, the children enjoyed a healthy and loving relationship with their paternal grandparents. Now, in a single gesture, with a wave of her hand, their mother has erased away the triplet's entire paternal family most of all their loving father as well as their grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. Their grandfather passed away with the heartbreak of not seeing his beloved triplet grandchildren while he was alive and became the latest innocent victim of this senseless situation. Who benefits? Certainly not the children.

The next day was the funeral for Mr. Mastrangelo and the church was packed with people wanting to show their respects for this very special man and his family. The priest who said the mass suggested that anyone who was touched in any way by Mr. Mastrangelo, to come visit his home to share their memories with the family. He suggested that the grandchildren ask to hear more stories about their grandparents and parents. Unfortunately, the triplets won't be there to benefit from the insight into the life of their father and grandfather, who they should surely grow to emulate. Jerry wrote a beautiful eulogy, extolling the virtues of his wonderful father. Often choking up, it was clear he was not only mourning the loss of his father but also the loss of his three children, bringing a tear to everyone's eye. He spoke of the loving and devotion shown to his father by his two sisters, brother and himself. The triplets sat in the back of the church with their mother. Was she extending an olive branch? Was it for show? Whatever the reason their presence spoke volumes...their mother wields an enormous amount of power over their children. She can "insist" that they attend the mass for their grandfather but she refuses to encourage the children to have any semblance of a relationship with their father. It was evident from the heartfelt tears shed by two of his three children that they were not only mourning the loss of their grandfather but they were also grieving their relationship with their father. The question keeps resonating in my mind...WHY? Why is this allowed to continue? What is the rationale? Where is Dr. Richard Formica, Trudianne's husband in all this? Does he actually support the alienation? With a child of his own, doesn't he understand the importance of this paternal bond? Don't either of them understand this dragging on only makes the lawyers richer?
It's been almost a week now since services were held for Mr. Mastrangelo. My guess is that it was not an olive branch that was being extended. Not one of the triplets has called their grandmother since her husband passed away almost two weeks ago. After one short conversation with his son, who he occasionally speaks to, Jerry has called daily. His phone calls go unanswered. He also calls Trudianne and her husband Dr. Richard Formica. They don't pick up their phones. One can only guess that the children's presence was indeed for show, as it is clear the children are her puppets. Unfortunately for her, the performance was only for her benefit.
In his eulogy, Jerry noted his father's words of encouragement...'never give up'. I am certain he won't disappoint him in his fight to become a father again to his three children.

Carrie Bradshaw November 10, 2012 at 07:26 pm
Parental alienation is child abuse. It's when one parent uses overt and/or covert strategies to manipulate a child into rejecting/abandoning the other parent. Some examples include rolling of the eyes when the other parent is mentioned, ignoring the other parent in the presence of the child, allowing the child to ignore the abandoned parent in the presence of the favored parent, pretending the other parent (targeted parent) is yelling and/or denigrating the favored parent on the telephone when the children are in earshot and it isn't true, sharing details with a child that does not benefit the child in any way, shape or form, telling the child the targeted parent has lied to them when in fact he/she is being a responsible parent by making sure the children are told age appropriate things at the right time and the list goes on and on. The above mentioned examples will do nothing other than hurt the child and make the favored/emotionally unstable parent feel in control. Of all the divorces in Connecticut, roughly 20% end up being high conflict divorces because one or both parents are emotionally unstable and in their zest to win at all costs, they use their children as pawns. When a parent gives the child the permission to reject and abuse the other parent, this is a form of emotional abuse. No child should ever be put in the position to do this. Imagine the guilt and long term affects these children will suffer from. My heart goes out to this family in particular.
Carrie Bradshaw November 10, 2012 at 07:26 pm
I am sorry, but I need to continue.... when a parent hides behind their child and uses their child as the scapegoat in an effort to take the blame off of them, this is child neglect. Parents are supposed to protect their child from hurt and pain as long as they're able to. Life can be a wonderful experience when parents are responsible and life can be a not so wonderful experience when parents are not responsible. When it comes to alienating a child from the other parent, it takes a lot of time and acts of bullying on the part of the alienator. When severe alienation takes hold, it's when the child ultimately takes on the role of the alienator so as to relieve the alienating parent from his/her duties. It's a way for the child to show their extreme loyalty to their favored parent. Typically, the favored parent is the primary care taker who has more time to directly and indirectly brainwash the child into thinking the other parent is all bad. When the child takes on this role, the alienating parent can sincerely say he/she can't do anything to change the child's mind. The alienator doesn’t need to do anything to further alienate the child because the child has been 100% indoctrinated into this emotionally unhealthy state. Imagine the hate this child has been taught? Watch the news, there's so much hate in this world and a child doesn't need to be taught how to hate someone, especially half of them. What does this say about their long term sense of security?
An Honest Observation March 15, 2013 at 01:54 am
As Jerry's sister testified yesterday, all extended family members are affected. His family has not seen the triplets in 2 1/2 years; his dad passed away in October, 2012 without having seen his grandaughter and his grandsons visited for a few minutes while he was dying. What kind of a mother would not encourage proper respect for a grandpa that loved his grandkids? Her attorney had the audacity to say that the family made disparaging remarks about her in front of the family.That never happened. She probably manipulated their minds, as alienating parents do, with her questions about family visits until the children eventually lied to her. The children's attorney, Anne Epstein, questioned why the best interests of the children were not considered when they were not included in the wake of their grandpa. If she and the GAL, Lynne Pellegrino, were focused on their best interests, a visit would have been recommended prior to his passing. The Mastrangelo's are strong and their values are solid. Their dad's wake was not going to be about the drama of a mother who deliberatly removed her children from their father's life. When Anne Epstein asked Jerry to open his wallet while on the stand and tell the court how many credit cards he had she was thinking about her best interests...making money off of a respected and professional man who happens to be a great and devoted dad fighting a broken system. Support Bill #77 to stop attorneys who only fight hard for their own wallets!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from East Haven Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Donna Caulfield June 19, 2013 at 09:13 am
So, who do you contact if you're interested?????
CitizenVoice June 19, 2013 at 12:41 am
I had family visit from out of town to attend a Little League game down by the beach. They justRead More loved the entire area, especially the splash pad and the Sandpiper. It made me stop, look around and appreciate how fortunate we are in East Haven to have such a great place for so many activities.
CitizenVoice June 19, 2013 at 12:37 am
I've taken the kids to this for the past 3 years. It is such a great time. Will be there this yearRead More too.
Elissa Bass (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 10:29 am
Hi Sam - our events calendar was having technical hiccups this morning so our engineering team hasRead More temporarily disabled it so they can dive in and fix it. I apologize for that, and I will let you know when the calendar is back up and running so you can post. Thank you!!
Lise Cavallaro June 17, 2013 at 09:37 am
I'm disappointed with the new format. Doesn't seem to be very user friendly.
Melissa Simoes June 17, 2013 at 09:06 am
It's probably the same punks who broke into our cars over on Mansfield Grove AGAIN.... the policeRead More think its a bunch of teenagers because they take little things that are not of much value in any cars that arent locked..and are also doing things like slashing tires, etc all over town. They got into my car the same night! Hope you find your scooter
paul beisler June 11, 2013 at 08:40 am
i don't live by the beach but i can guess what a zoo it must be- the town really should charge nonRead More residents and use the money to help the congestion good luck for a rainy summer :) paul beisler
David Lalama June 10, 2013 at 07:33 pm
One Tearm Dan ........
Lou June 11, 2013 at 09:30 am
Gov. O'mally is ruining this State by driving more and more people into poverty, giving illegalsRead More drivers licenses, letting criminals out of jail early, pushing good companies out, and making it's citizens unsafe. Time to clean house starting locally!
Richard Poulton June 11, 2013 at 10:19 am
WE THE PEOPLE have no say in how governments govern nor how OUR money is spent. WE supposedly electRead More people who take the trust of the people with them when elected and do the will of WE THE PEOPLE. This has never happened. Especially in state and federal office. Once in office the power they discover they now have pushes aside the will of the people. It an attitude of we have the power and you don't. Someday, but I doubt it, we can elect those who will not loose site of why they were elected.