.
Feedback

You’re Guilty! She’s Guilty! We’re ALL Guilty!

Forget Macauley Culkin’s “Home Alone” comedy. These days, is it ever a laughing matter — let alone acceptable — when a child is left home without an adult present?

You and I are guilty.

What crime have we committed?  Apparently, at some point in our lives, we’ve been guilty either of child neglect or of busybody, un-neighborly meddling.

Consider the judgmental reactions to the recent case of a when her 4-year-old wandered off while in the care of a 13-year-old sibling. Judging by those judgmental reactions, there’s no right in this situation, so you and I must be similarly guilty as charged.

According to published reports, police say this mother left her four children—ranging in age from 13 years to 8 months—alone at home to go to church. Police were called to the home by a neighbor who said the woman’s 4-year-old had wandered into the yard across the street alone. Police arrested the mother and charged her with risk of injury to a minor.

When Patch published the police blotter arrest report, comments flew fast and furious—170 at last count in the days that followed since the arrest. Here’s the understatement of the year:  about whether the mother was right to leave her eldest child to watch over the younger three children, and whether she as the parent should be held accountable when the 4-year-old wandered off.

But just as there are critics of the mom, Patch readers had some forceful opinions about the neighbor who summoned police, with some accusing her of acting in anything but a neighborly way. Instead of calling police, many said, she should have simply walked the child back across the street and offered a sympathetic hand to a fellow resident.

Dorothy, it seems we’re not in small town—or old time—Kansas anymore.

In some ways I’ve been both the parent in this situation and the kid. And at one point or another, I’m sure I’ve been the bystander too.

As a parent, I’ve got to say deciding when and whether to leave your children is a case-by-case thing and it’s completely individual.

I've hired 13-year-old babysitters to watch my children when they were between 18 months and 6-years-old. I knew the teens well and they were truly smart, responsible kids—plus I wasn't headed into New York City for a late night out, but rather I’d opted for this childcare solution knowing I’d be close by right here in town.

I’d like to think that a mother knows her own child and that child's abilities and limits; many readers felt it was wrong to criticize the mother's parenting without knowing the full extent of the family’s situation. With our own pre-tween 10-year-old, my husband and I have begun to figure out how to begin extending the boundaries and comfort levels of leaving him alone for 15 minutes or so and teaching him how to feel comfortable and responsible when he’s old enough to spend more extensive time on his own.

Each parent has to determine when moments are right to teach children responsibilities and independence. So too, sometimes, the realities of busy family life and schedules necessitate teaching kids how to care for themselves and siblings. That should be up to the parents, within the confines of the law. 

Speaking of which, what does the law say about this case? Not a whole lot. There are guidelines provided by CT’s Department of Children and Family that say it’s up to each parent, depending on their child’s readiness, but that “Experts believe a child should be at least 12 before he is left alone, and at least 15 before he can care for a younger brother or sister. These are the minimum ages. Not every child is ready then.”

(It’s important to note that, according to safekids.org, “even if a state does not have a specific law prohibiting adults from leaving children unattended, state and local prosecutors have the discretion to criminally charge adults under existing child endangerment laws.”)

Way back when I was a child, I walked to and from school alone from the age of five. Different times, different mores, I know. Looking back even further, the summer when my dad was only 10, his hard-working parents stayed in the city to work while they left him alone at a Catskills summer bungalow colony, Mondays through Saturday mornings.

Five and a half days. Alone.

They’d leave him with a big pot of spaghetti in the fridge, and under the watchful eye of the neighbor friend across the path every week, and he survived just fine until they joined him each weekend.

I joke that today my dad would be on the cover of the New York Post for days on end if he were a child of 2012. But then I think about the Etan Patz case making recent headlines again, and it’s no longer something to laugh about. Suddenly the good old days don’t feel so ‘safe’ anymore.

Which brings us to our ‘busybody’ neighbor. Perhaps she was the last defense between that New Canaan 4-year-old and tomorrow’s New York Post cover story. Who knows the true situation and back story there? Perhaps there were prior incidents of negligence, or bad blood between the main characters that prompted a vengeful call to police. There’s a wistful voice inside my head that asks, What happened to simply walking the neighbor’s 4-year-old back home before calling in the national guard? Perhaps she saved a life that day instead.

We hear more and more stories of parents who make poor choices to leave their children unattended— about kids left in a coffee shop while their mom grocery shopped ran shortly after the New Canaan story—and I’ve heard multiple local anecdotes of parents leaving minors in a car to dash in somewhere for a fast errand, only to find police waiting for them on their return.

In some ways, we’ve all been there, and made a momentary, split-second decision on either side of the coin. Do I wake the baby if I need to wait for my older child at the corner bus stop? Will my children be okay if I just step out of the car and leave them for a few moments to pay for gas inside the station or pick up the dry cleaning? Do I say something to that woman on the beach who walked away from her young children twice in the last hour?

Is it that times have changed? Because it isn’t that parents and kids have.  Should we look at this story with the stark, modern reality that there are bad people ‘Out There’ and feel that the need to be watchful, neurotic and paranoid in a big bad dark world is real?

Or are we mournful about the sad loss of a more innocent time, of neighbors who knew each other and looked out for one another, when police officers knew the community well enough to say, "It's a babysitting-sibling-family-thing, no need to handcuff anyone."

That’s overly simplistic but either way, the times, they have sure changed. So perhaps we need to realize that human nature hasn’t. Just as parents sometimes make poor choices when they're in need of a fast solution in busy times, so too is there a rush to criticize someone else’s choice, even in that there-but-for-the-grace-of-the-universe-go-I moment in time.

For even if we haven’t walked a mile in someone else’s shoes, at some point we likely have taken a few steps along the very same path.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from East Haven Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Not Guido May 19, 2013 at 10:11 am
I agree Jack is a good man. He however needs to better explain his financial problems. ForeclosureRead More doesn't go forward due to a mistake. Stand up and tell the truth. If you fell behind and got back on track tell us.
Sam Giglio May 18, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Jack is a good and decent man, He would be an asset to this Town if Elected to serve as our Mayor.Read More With that said we look forward to a new beginning in East Haven, One that can set the path to a new vision for the Residents who live here now and the ones yet to come. Yes its easy to say I like Jack
Richard Poulton May 18, 2013 at 03:53 pm
Gene, Jack is your party's pick, so what else are you to say. As to Jack, if he is anything likeRead More his father he IS a good man. But being just a good man doesn't cut it in todays small world politics. Jack has issues he needs to explain and I am sure when he time comes he will. But as to this article, I wouldn't expect anything else from the SHADOW. Wouldn't want him backing me for anything.
Richard Poulton May 19, 2013 at 08:24 am
I asked the question and you gave me the answer I was looking for, and I thank you for that. As toRead More the rest of your dribble, doesn't deserve a response for EVERYONR knows all about the true Gene aka ******** Ruocco.
Gene Ruocco May 18, 2013 at 04:24 pm
Richard, the Mayor kicked the CEO of the company that had the contract out of his office less than aRead More month after he won the election. The contract was with the town not the BOE. And if you think the only thing to check is if the panels are dirty, then it isn't worth answering you. A large investment of tax dollars was made and it is paying off with lower electric bills. The systems delivering these savings need to be checked, that is why people who were smart enough to sign a maintenance agreement did just that. Ask the BOE how the chiller replacement is going at the High School; due to lack of maintenance they lost two chillers that should have lasted at least 10 to 15 more years. Penny wise and dollar foolish is what this is all about, not the election year, but what else could we expect from you Richard. You have become the cheer leader of the administration.
Richard Poulton May 18, 2013 at 03:58 pm
Boy, you just know it's an election year. Gene, one question, when was this contract stopped?Read More Just now or some time ago, but seeing its getting "close' to November you just thought you would bring this up. Besides, shouldn't your question be aimed at the B of E, not the Mayor. And what is to be maintained anyway beside washing the panals now and then? You just keep us all informed now Gene.
Anne Santello May 16, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Thanks Richard. Allison...I know that street is crazy!! I was just saying that the van makes theRead More stop sign so hard to see. I wish they would put a cop there too. Unfortunately, things don't get attention until something bad happens.
AllisonWonderland Beckert May 16, 2013 at 05:58 pm
Please, a parked Van you are worrying about???? Every Morning in that same area of Chidsey,Read More Thompson, Prospect. etc, Cars, Trucks etc. Blast thru the Stop Signs and continue on their merry way. I'd worry about the kids walking to the bus stops and school being run down by these careless drivers... EVERY DAY I SEE IT !!!! I wish the Police Department would put an unmarked car in the area.. The Town of East Haven would be rich from ALL the Fines !!!!!
Richard Poulton May 16, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Anne, go to town clerks office and get a copy of Town Codes, Article ll, Section 12-16 and 12-17.Read More Section 12-17 defines an abandoned M/V as any M/V which is "inoperatable", or unregistered and is left in one location for a continuous period of more than 24 hours. Then call the Chiefs office and hit him with that. If nothing happens go to next Town Council meeting and during general public comments ask WHY nothing is done when complaint is made. Good luck.
From Left to Right - Media Club co-sponsor and East Haven High School teacher Robert Becker, sophomore Chris Maiorano (standing in for sister Ariel), Senior Skyler Alsever, Alumni Melissa Morro, Senior Cindy Recinos  and Media Club co-sponsor and Eas
Carole May 19, 2013 at 03:47 pm
My son, Skyler Alsever wrote the script, and acted in the film. He is interested in film making inRead More addition to his computer engineering future. He will go places with his promising future. We are very proud of him.
CitizenVoice May 15, 2013 at 03:06 am
"Nature will reclaim what we took from it in past years." I guess there is one thing weRead More agree on. And it started to sound good until the "government will make me whole, no matter what...." Political trip-wire. I have always felt no one should be allowed to claim or build on shoreline land within a mile of the water, with the exception of ports, on either coast. If it all were National Park lands... if only that decision was made way back when the land was pure and clean... the present and future wouldn't be as nightmarish as it inevitably will be. Only 50 years ago, when I was a very small child, I remember chasing all kinds of sea creatures (crabs, sea horses, star fish) around Silver Sands beach while my Dad caught a bushel of flounder. Where are they now? Yup, I'm a "Tree-Hugger" and, as outrageous as such a plan would be, I would throw all my energy behind a plan to de-populate the shoreline.
Richard Poulton May 14, 2013 at 07:10 pm
In the neigborhood of 135 words and you said what? Nature will reclaim what we took from it inRead More past years. Storms will happen, gee thats news, build a home on the shore line and it maybe lost due to a storm, power will be lost for awhile, OH my God. Far too much traffic, what are we to do? Update a plan for what purpose, the government will make me whole no matter what I do or what circumstance I put myself into. Give me a break! Like the old saying goes. **** happens, deal with it.