Community Corner

Connecticut Joins States in Same-Sex Marriage Support

Connecticut and two other states say that the federal "Defense of Marriage Act" is unconstitutional. And the three have jointly filed a friends of the court brief in a case pending in federal court of appeals.

The attorney generals of Connecticut, New York and Vermont have jointly asked a federal appeals court to declare the unconstitutionality of a federal law that refuses recognition for same-sex marriages. 

The federal statute, called the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, defines marriage for all federal purposes as “only a legal union between one man and one woman.”

Because of DOMA, married same-sex couples in Vermont and other states are not eligible for a wide range of federal benefits and are treated as unmarried for federal tax purposes.

Find out what's happening in East Havenwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

“These married couples – our friends and neighbors in Vermont – have every right to fair and equal treatment by the federal government,” said Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell. “Instead, they are denied Social Security benefits, tax exemptions, and health and retirement benefits. I am pleased to have worked with New York and Connecticut on this brief urging the Second Circuit to end this discriminatory practice.”

The joint filing by the three states is a “friend of the court” brief in a case pending in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City. The brief emphasizes that states, not the federal government, regulate marriage and family relationships, and argues that Congress does not have authority to refuse recognition for same-sex marriages allowed under state law.

Find out what's happening in East Havenwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The case is Windsor v. United States, No. 12-2335, pending in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. A Congressional group called the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, or BLAG, is defending DOMA. The U.S. Department of Justice has taken the position that the challenged provision of DOMA is unconstitutional.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here